In a world where the Republicans are always denouncing the Democrats, the liberals always taking pot-shots at the conservatives, the my-view-is-bests kicking around the your-view-is-stupids, Christians can take the higher road and know the following:
1. Not all things in this world can be known
2. Not all problems can be solved
3. This life is not the endgame; it's actually just the path to real life.
But despite having these advantages over their fellow, bickering humans, Christians still seem to think that if they elect certain people or implement certain ideologies, this world can be saved. (Their marching in lockstep with the latest swirls of Republicanism, including Dick Cheney and Sarah Palin, especially scares me.) While Christians have the most assurance and hope in life, with the peace that comes from (God's) intended ignorance of life's idiosyncrasies, they still try to fix, control, and tweak.
This New York Times column from today, however, reminded me that this surge in Christians trying to make political advances is really just a sign that Christians are humans, too. And humans today increasingly think this world can be fixed, or some systems can be run perfectly. Although David Brooks takes a different route, his message is good for Christians to heed as well. In our technology-obsessed world, as advancements have been made to correct certain problems, we increasingly think this world can be steered toward perfection, and we react immaturely when it is not.
Work hard, influence well, do your best; but never think that there is no room for error or mishap. Tragedy will come. Yet Christians have the hope of not only knowing that this life is meant for tragedy, but also knowing that they have a better life around the corner.
Christians shouldn't be blown around by the winds of current events (another bomber, the socialization of health care, the stupidity of sinful people). They can make their voice heard in a country where they've been given the right to vote and speak, and they can look to love their fellow men. But their aim should not be the correction of the current life; it should be toward helping people see past this life.
The better life spoken about by Jesus Christ (Whose kingdom was not of this earth) is what Christians should be preaching.
Showing posts with label dick cheney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dick cheney. Show all posts
1.01.2010
9.18.2009
Newsweek doctoring
Let me start by saying that my intention is not to bash Newsweek as much as possible. But the revamped newsmag just keeps giving me opportunities to chirp. I find so many problems, or just under-par production that Newsweek almost begs me to complain about itself, whereas its competitor, Time magazine, never hits me the wrong way (but wait until Joel Stein gets me riled up again).
This week it's one of those massive photos that Newsweek runs with no refer or other note of importance — basically a standalone photo that carries tons of questions and no answers. This photo (seen here, with the original photo), of Dick Cheney slicing up some meat at home with his family, was doctored to emphasize a quote that was superimposed over it — a quote about torture.
I've already talked about hating these huge, standalone photos, and this photo embodies everything that is wrong with this Newsweek practice. It's misleading, sensational, and has virtually no news value — especially if it doesn't refer to a later story where the facts can be explained.
Newsweek has said that its new version will be better journalism, and less celebrity- and general-life-focused, but these photo debacles show they've really taken a step back.
This week it's one of those massive photos that Newsweek runs with no refer or other note of importance — basically a standalone photo that carries tons of questions and no answers. This photo (seen here, with the original photo), of Dick Cheney slicing up some meat at home with his family, was doctored to emphasize a quote that was superimposed over it — a quote about torture.
I've already talked about hating these huge, standalone photos, and this photo embodies everything that is wrong with this Newsweek practice. It's misleading, sensational, and has virtually no news value — especially if it doesn't refer to a later story where the facts can be explained.
Newsweek has said that its new version will be better journalism, and less celebrity- and general-life-focused, but these photo debacles show they've really taken a step back.
Labels:
dick cheney,
joel stein,
newsweek,
time magazine
5.22.2009
That's enough from you, Cheney
Anyone else tired of hearing Dick Cheney constantly criticize the Obama administration and act like the country is seconds away from disaster? I'll leave aside who is right and who is wrong on this one and instead say, Cool it, Cheney. There are many reasons you shouldn't be blabbing, but the one that really irks me is that your time in the sun is over. Let the Repubicans deal with Obama, and at least give them some time before you act like you can know whether their policies are right or not (it's been four months).
Bush is the wise one here.
Bush is the wise one here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)